Developed by scientists at Harvard University, the glycemic load (GL) utilizes a food's glycemic index but then adjusts its rating to account for the quantity of available carbohydrates (carbs minus fiber or 'net' carbs) actually found within a portion size (rather than using the amount of a product needed to produce 50 grams of net carbs which may be significantly more or less than what a typical portion size would be).
The following formula can be used to determine glycemic load:
Glycemic Index multiplied by grams of available carbohydrates then divided by 100
simply put:
GI x Carbs /100
For example, if a bagel has a GI rating of 72 with 25 grams of net carbs, then
72 x 25 = 1800/100 for a GL of 18
Foods considered to have a low glycemic load have a rating of 10 or less. The moderate range lies from 11 to 19 while foods with a rating of 20 or more are considered high.
Comparing the rating scales of glycemic index versus glycemic load:
Essentially, foods that are dense with carbs are likely to have a lower glycemic index rating than glycemic load since the 50 grams of net carbs used to calculate its GI my be less than what is consumed in an actual serving portion used to determine its GL.
i.e. Macaroni - glycemic index = 47 (low) glycemic load = 23 (high)
Likewise, foods that are sparse in carbs are likely to have lower glycemic load ratings since the amount of carbs consumed in a normal serving is less then the 50 grams consumed to determine the glycemic index.
i.e. Watermelon - glycemic index = 72 (high) glycemic load = 4 (low)
While the adjustment for portion size does address one of the criticisms levied against the glycemic index, the other concerns regarding GI outcome variations based on cooking times, ripeness and additional stomach contents also apply to glymecic load scores as does individual insulin responses.